YouMe.Social Debacle

    Written by Mathew Naismith I wrote this post in relation to the following query. “So, how I stumbled upon your post upon looking for YouMe Social. I'm wanting to get some clarification about your claim that YouMe Social is pro atheist. This is concerning as I'm not... I'm Christian and also with YouMe Social. I don't visit it regularly but wanted to check it out as I came across it from an article about FB alternatives. But, if what you say is true, I then I will cancel my account.” I joined a humanity group set up by a known atheist, in actuality, youme social was supported and set up from G+ by atheists, the owners of youme is a known atheist to begin with. What I am going to do is try to post a post on this blog showing my initial post in this community that resulted in a person named Grace, a known atheist, using intimidation by discussing anything but what the post of mine was about time and time again. This was allowed to go on due to the creator a...

Written by Mathew Naismith Found a different way to access this blog, anyway on with the post.    It is not the quantity of numbers that will win the day in the end; it is the quality of numbers. Firstly, hate groups are obvious in the way they work by dividing, divide and conquer.   My own projected honest truth is not well liked on the net, in actuality it is quite hated and/or despised by many, however, by a few, my own projected open honesty is revered. Some of my written material was used in a College in the US .   I have also been unsuccessfully coaxed into placing my written material on an academia site backed by a well known university in England . On an atheist owned, run and backed social site, my written material was too obviously despised. You see, bias desired truths are always at war with honest truth, but honest truth is never at war with desired truth. Look at it this way; are virtuous people at war with unvirtuous people? No, vi...

Written by Mathew Naismith Sequential motion is of harmony, especially when one is within a nonsequential existence of motion. Sequential motion relates to a motion not divided by indifferences, the variables of motion, rather a motion focused on the deference's of motion. People like me don't seek, desire or expect harmony and peace within an environment of infinite variables, we go with the flow of the variables, not against them. These variables, that we have labelled negative and positive, harmony and disharmony, black and white and so forth, are simply an interpretation by the ego of the environment around us. Within this perception, a desired truth is created, not an honest truth, for the ego will always accept a desired truth over and above honest truth any day. These variables are simply a part of change within a reality of motion. If all we seek is harmony within such a reality, all we would be doing is going against the natural flow of change occurri...

Written by Mathew Naismith I am not sure but I think the following was the post I posted on youme, the very same post that an atheist did anything but follow the topic of the post. This person made sure there was no debate on the main topic of this post. As I found through extensive experience with radical atheists, they will by any means disrupt or destroy anything that remotely threatens their beliefs and doctrines. To me, it was obvious what was actually occurring. The moderator confirmed this in her own inactions towards a person who obviously wasn't debating, but simply trying to create an argumentative exchange between me and themselves. Within this inaction, it was obvious the moderator wasn't just supportive of robust debates/discussion, but argumentative exchanges that are anything but of debates/discussions, in my case anyway.    To be positive or in spiritual harmony, should I have ignore these people? If I ignored this person and other people on...

Written by Mathew Naismith When I am asked about YouMe.Social in all honesty, I of course have to answer in all honesty going by my own experiences with Youme. I asked to be removed from youme for a very good reason, harassment by atheists, including the owner, was indeed the main reason. When I wrote a post about the beliefs of atheism, all hell broke loose not long after I blocked an atheist for indiscreet interactions with me for a second time. After posting this post, an atheist did anything but keep to the main topic, in actuality, they did everything possible to be as disruptive as possible. Soon after that, another person, whose friend I blocked earlier, fully supported this action of not keeping to the topic. I then entered into a robust discussion with this person who encourages robust discussions as stated, " None of the individuals responding to the original post have done so in an inappropriate or rude fashion. OH is a discussion community: we encoura...