YouMe.Social Debacle
Written by Mathew Naismith
When I am asked about YouMe.Social in all honesty,
I of course have to answer in all honesty going by my own experiences with
Youme.
I asked to be removed from youme for a very
good reason, harassment by atheists, including the owner, was indeed the main
reason. When I wrote a post about the beliefs of atheism, all hell broke loose
not long after I blocked an atheist for indiscreet interactions with me for a
second time.
After posting this post, an atheist did
anything but keep to the main topic, in actuality, they did everything possible
to be as disruptive as possible. Soon after that, another person, whose friend
I blocked earlier, fully supported this action of not keeping to the topic. I
then entered into a robust discussion with this person who encourages robust
discussions as stated, "None of the
individuals responding to the original post have done so in an inappropriate or
rude fashion. OH is a discussion community: we encourage robust discussion and
debate."
So to deliberately not stick to the topic and totally defuse
the topic isn't rude and disrespectful to the presenter of the post!! What
debate or discussion do you have when people don't stick to the topic, in fact
deliberately go off topic?
The following is what I was harassed for and banned which
lead to me asking to be removed from youme. As I responded to Heather with the following, a
person who is a moderator on our humanity group on youme:
"Heather
Wallace Of course not, going deliberately off topic numerous
times is what, especially when asked a number of times to stay on topic. It is
not a debate when you go off topic like this, so what is it Heather? Simply an
argumentative exchange which has no purpose but to intimidate. So it is obvious
you encourage argumentative exchanges it would seem!!
Humanity = The quality of being human
Debate = A discussion in which reasons are advanced for and against some proposition or proposal
I cannot see where obvious argumentative exchanges comes under either debate or humanity!!
It would also seem you encourage that no one should stay on topic as well. Not only this, you encourage people to go off topic as well as enforcing argumentative exchanges!!
So showing a deliberate disrespect for the presenter of the OP isn't rude to you, even when asked numerous times to stay on topic? Actually, Grace was never on topic from the start.
Humanity = The quality of being human
Debate = A discussion in which reasons are advanced for and against some proposition or proposal
I cannot see where obvious argumentative exchanges comes under either debate or humanity!!
It would also seem you encourage that no one should stay on topic as well. Not only this, you encourage people to go off topic as well as enforcing argumentative exchanges!!
So showing a deliberate disrespect for the presenter of the OP isn't rude to you, even when asked numerous times to stay on topic? Actually, Grace was never on topic from the start.
Intimidate = Make timid or
fearful, To compel or deter by or as if by threats
Especially after your response here, I am fearful of putting myself through such an unwarranted behaviour again that has nothing to do with the OP. So actually you are encouraging intimidation as well it would seem!!
This is certainly a threat to human decency wouldn't you say Heather? So as long as you are indecent, the humanity group is for you? You are actually asking me to put up with intimidation and indecency, in a humanity group!!
Indecency = An indecent or improper act
I had no idea you were like this Heather, so be it.
In the future Heather, please, never ask me to put up with obvious indecency and intimidation again as I have proven here. I am an advocate against abuse, I will not tolerate abuse of this kind by people like you and Grace in any group or social network. OK, you are obviously an advocate for abuse which simply says we will never see eye to eye.
Unbelievable and they wonder why the world is the way it is!!"
Especially after your response here, I am fearful of putting myself through such an unwarranted behaviour again that has nothing to do with the OP. So actually you are encouraging intimidation as well it would seem!!
This is certainly a threat to human decency wouldn't you say Heather? So as long as you are indecent, the humanity group is for you? You are actually asking me to put up with intimidation and indecency, in a humanity group!!
Indecency = An indecent or improper act
I had no idea you were like this Heather, so be it.
In the future Heather, please, never ask me to put up with obvious indecency and intimidation again as I have proven here. I am an advocate against abuse, I will not tolerate abuse of this kind by people like you and Grace in any group or social network. OK, you are obviously an advocate for abuse which simply says we will never see eye to eye.
Unbelievable and they wonder why the world is the way it is!!"
On another social network, I
have numerous friends and I have been asked to join a number of groups, unlike
Youme. If the problem was with me, why is this quite the opposite on another
social network? The honest answer is quite interesting."
I received the
following from the owner of youme in a private message to me after I asked twice
to be removed from youme:
"Jamez Frondeskias You got evicted from the site for
your language and behaviour towards one female member on the site and the
tirade of [and i will be nice with the following words] "compliments"
you paid one of the female moderators in a chat."
The owners of youme wrote a message and told everyone on
youme I was evicted, no mention of me asking to be removed twice over. Not only
is the endorsement of abusive robust interactions supported on youme, only by
certain members that is, so is blatant deception by the owner of youme. I was
banned because I presumingly denigrated anther person one on one, not
denigrated another person publicly as the owner of youme proceeded to do.
What ended up occurring was constructive in relation to me.
It is not very constructive in being in such an environment as youme.social,
not for me anyway. The consciousness (people) running youme isn't anything like
G+ or MeWe, obviously.
No, I can't myself endorse youme.social for a very good
reason.
Seen as I can't post anymore posts on this blog:
ReplyDeleteExposing Hate Groups
Written by Mathew Naismith
It is not the quantity of numbers that will win the day in the end; it is the quality of numbers.
Firstly, hate groups are obvious in the way they work by dividing, divide and conquer.
My own projected honest truth is not well liked on the net, in actuality it is quite hated and/or despised by many, however, by a few, my own projected open honesty is revered. Some of my written material was used in a College in the US. I have also been unsuccessfully coaxed into placing my written material on an academia site backed by a well known university in England. On an atheist owned, run and backed social site, my written material was too obviously despised. You see, bias desired truths are always at war with honest truth, but honest truth is never at war with desired truth. Look at it this way; are virtuous people at war with unvirtuous people? No, virtuous people are simply being virtuous but unvirtuous people see this as an attack on their desired truths. When I look at the people who despise me on the net, all I see is how close to the truth I am, sadly enough.
Open honest unbiased truth is not just being ostracised or banished these days, it is being destroyed. Look at the people who are trying to banish hate groups and stop bullying on the net, this is while they are not stopping but fully supporting well known hate groups going into countries like Palestine and Yemen!! On top of this, you have hate groups who hate anything negative, so they simply ignore the obvious honest truth in favour of desired truths.
While on youme.social, I was accused of not liking my views put to the question. This is while I was harassed and bullied into asking to be removed from being a member of youme, as I seriously questioned the falsities and hypocrisies of atheistic ideologies. Because I could see what was going on youme, I purposely posted a post questioning atheistic ideologies. Often, deceptive manipulative people will use deflective tactics, in this case with me, accusing me of not liking my views questioned, when in all honesty these people didn't like their views questioned, obviously.
I am a huge threat to these people because I copied certain parts of my conversation with them. Never play all your cards at once with people like this. I am not at war with people like this, just simply openly expressing honest truths rather than a desired truth in accordance with my own ideologies, isms or beliefs. What hate groups hate the most is anyone who they hate isn't also a part of a hate group in opposition to their own hate group. What occurs in this case is they deceptively make themselves believe that they are also hated, when someone is simply being expressive of honest truth or virtuous attributes.
The average atheist is simply being expressive of atheism, as religious people are simply being expressive of their religion. Hate groups of these ideologies and other ideologies are not just simply being expressive but forceful of their expressions, especially when they perceive that another group is in direct opposition, at war, with their own group. Yes, make no mistake, desired truth is at war with honest truth, the trick is, don't be coaxed in just being another hate group, even of hate groups as a whole. Simply look at hate groups as being lost within their own creation, no more, no less.
Yes, my writing's are not of an academic quality, but what I write about often is it would seem.......